The horrific nature of the mass
shootings over the past weekend and the unmistakable aim outlined in the El
Paso shooter’s manifesto forced President Trump to make an uncharacteristic
condemnation of white supremacy.

But efforts to reframe the tragedy
to serve a far-right agenda can already be seen at the fringes of the political
and media ecosystem.

On Tuesday, Trump addressed the
nation in the lower-register voice and scripted platitudes he uses when a
national tragedy requires him to say something comforting and unifying. He will
undoubtedly revert to scapegoating, rage, division and insult in campaign
speeches and on Twitter once the nation’s attention turns elsewhere.

“In one voice, our nation must
condemn racism, bigotry and white supremacy,” the president intoned in his
official address. “These sinister ideologies must be defeated. Hate has no
place in America.”

What he did not do is take
responsibility for stoking the hate that rained a fusillade of bullets at
Walmart in El Paso on Aug. 3, snuffing out 22 lives, including eight Mexican nationals.

The shooter used the word “invaders”
or “invasion” to refer to people coming across the southern border to the
United States seven times in the four-page manifesto posted to 8chan minutes
before the attack. Notably, the Pittsburgh synagogue shooter condemned a Jewish
refugee assistance agency for bringing in “invaders” in his last post on Gab
before he killed 11 people in October 2018.

Trump has used the words “invaders”
and “invasion” over and over again during campaign speeches and tweets since he
made fear of the migrant caravan the centerpiece of his efforts to thwart
Democratic gains in the 2018 election.

During a rally in Grand Rapids,
Mich. in March, Trump told his supporters: “We’re on track for a million
illegal aliens trying to rush our borders. It is an invasion, you know that?”

In contrast to the El Paso shooter, the atrocity committed by his counterpart in Dayton — another young, white man, who left a body count of nine — does not easily yield political meaning. He was well known to his former classmates in the Dayton suburb of Bellbrook, who recalled that he drew up a “rape list.”

Toxic masculinity? Check. And the fact that his younger sister was among the victims suggests profound nihilism. But white nationalism, not so much. In fact, the Dayton shooter reportedly described himself as a “leftist” on Twitter and expressed approval towards antifascism and left political standard-bearers Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren.

He was also a member of a band that
performed pornogrind, a metal genre that specializes in gruesome, sexually
explicit and satirical lyrics.

On Monday, the right-wing
provocateur-slash-journalist Andy Ngo tweeted that the “the black metal antifa
band Neckbeard Deathcamp tweeted (then deleted) that the Ohio shooter was a
member of the band.”

Will Carless, a respected
investigative reporter with Reveal, replied, “This is untrue,” while inviting
Ngo to read the band’s Twitter timeline. “Then delete and correct this,”
Carless added. “That’s called ‘journalism.’”

Ngo’s profile rose exponentially last month when he was milkshaked and repeatedly punched in the face by a group of left-wing activists in Portland, Ore. His journalistic work to date consists of a highly questionable claim that Muslim immigrants in England have created “no-go zones,” attempts to expose hate crimes as hoaxes and “exposing what he sees as the underreported violence of antifa,” according to a report by Shane Burley.

On Tuesday, the New York Post published an op-ed piece by Ngo entitled, “Dayton shooter may be antifa’s first mass killer.”

Whether Ngo’s work qualifies as
journalism or not shouldn’t be debated. Any person who collects facts and
presents them in a narrative is a journalist. It’s not a licensed profession.
Whether it’s good journalism or bad journalism is another question.

Prior to the El Paso and Dayton
shootings, US Rep. Mark Walker, who represents Greensboro, posed for a photo
with Ngo, while announcing a resolution “condemning antifa’s violence and
engagement in domestic terrorism,” and accusing “antifa” of “attacks without
equivocation at our First Amendment.”

The breathtakingly narrow tailoring of Walker’s resolution ignores the fact that violence against journalists goes far beyond “antifa”; significantly, a Trump supporter attacked a journalist during the Orlando rally. Also, “antifa” has yet to kill anyone (Ngo’s speculation about the Dayton shooter’s motives notwithstanding), while the FBI acknowledges that the far right and white nationalists are responsible for the highest share by far of domestic-terrorist violence in recent years.

Following up on the apparently
jesting tweet that the Dayton shooter was a member of the band, the
administrator of the Neckbeard Deathcamp account offered an explanation,
showing strikingly more self-reflection than the president of the United
States.

“I did not know Conner Betts [sic]
personally, but the Midwest grind scene isn’t large and we [spent] a lot of
time pushing pornogrind out of Chicago DIY,” they wrote. “For what it’s worth,
men who cape hardline left politics who still treat women like shit are not
exactly a new invention. It’s a monumentally larger problem than just this one
dude, and disassembling it requires more than just patting ourselves on the
back for booting scene rapists from shows until they move to another city.”

Join the First Amendment Society, a membership that goes directly to funding TCB‘s newsroom.

We believe that reporting can save the world.

The TCB First Amendment Society recognizes the vital role of a free, unfettered press with a bundling of local experiences designed to build community, and unique engagements with our newsroom that will help you understand, and shape, local journalism’s critical role in uplifting the people in our cities.

All revenue goes directly into the newsroom as reporters’ salaries and freelance commissions.

🗲 Join The Society 🗲