Featured photos: People outside of the Arkansas state capitol protesting the admission of the “Little Rock Nine” to Central High School in 1959 on the left. Take Back Our Schools members protesting critical race theory at the June 17 school board meeting on the right.
In recent months, messages and actions by a vocal group of conservatives directed at Guilford County Schools Superintendent Sharon Contreras have become increasingly more threatening, according to some school board members and a sample of messages obtained by Triad City Beat through a public records request.
On June 10, during a regular school board meeting, members of Take Back Our Schools gathered outside of the school district offices and began banging on the windows of the building. The members, part of a local conservative coalition of parents and community members who have advocated for an increase in school resource officers, protested an appeals process for suspensions and now oppose critical race theory, pushed through the hedges that flank the outside of the office and pressed their signs against the windows, prompting one district administrator and a police officer to ask them to step back. As they protested, they used a megaphone to project their grievances.
On June 17, a smaller group returned with Stephanie Mitchell, a local mother, at the helm. During the protest, Mitchell and others argued that the school board was keeping parents out of the meetings and shutting down free speech; the board voted that day to reopen meetings to the public starting in July. The meetings had been conducted virtually and livestreamed for much of 2020 and half of 2021 due to the pandemic, allowing for members of the public to submit comments online.
Whatever the board’s decision, much of the anger by the group has been directed towards Contreras, who has been the district’s superintendent since 2016.
“The problem is that she thinks that she is president and CEO,” Mitchell said. “What she has forgotten is that she is an employee that can be fired. The problem is that the school board has given all of their authority to her so they couldn’t fire her even if they wanted to.”
Contreras received an increase in temporary authorization from the school board back in March 2020, because of special circumstances brought upon by the pandemic. During the March 13, 2020 meeting, the school board voted unanimously to allow Contreras to “act as expeditiously necessary to protect the health and welfare of students and staff of Guilford County Schools” by “temporarily [waiving] board policies allowing the district to implement appropriate response measures related to COVID-19.”
Nora Carr, chief of staff for the school district, told TCB that Contreras has not used her emergency authority once during the pandemic. Carr also noted that the school board has the authority to vote on whether or not to rescind those powers at any time.
“I think that that mythology is part of an orchestrated misinformation campaign,” Carr said about Take Back Our Schools’ notion that Contreras is acting as a dictator.
She also noted that many school districts around the state, not just Guilford County, enacted similar emergency authorization for superintendents last year.
At-large board member Winston McGregor and District 3 member Pat Tillman told TCB the increase in authority does not change Contreras’ contract, which was renewed in 2019 for the next four years. It also does not prevent the school board, which determines her job status, from terminating her contract.
“The legal authority of a duly elected school board is still intact,” Tillman said. “That still stays and remains. School boards hire and fire superintendents; that’s how it is.”
McGregor stated that there is broad support for Contreras amongst a majority of the board members and that she has the respect of many in the city. T. Diane Bellamy-Small of District 1 who has served on the board since 2016, said she doesn’t see why there would be any mention of firing Contreras.
“Why would there be?” Bellamy-Small asked. “If you look at her performance record, she has knocked it out of the record during the pandemic.”
Contreras was named Superintendent of the Year by the North Carolina PTA in 2019 and a North Carolina Regional Superintendent of the Year last year. In early 2020, she was also a finalist to be picked as President Joe Biden’s education secretary. The position eventually went to now-secretary Miguel Cardona.
How conservatives are using critical race theory to galvanize local communities
During the protest outside of the building on June 17, the group of mostly white parents held signs that read, “Open up the meetings” and “You work for us,” which addressed the fact that the meetings hadn’t yet been physically opened up to the public yet. However, at least one parent held a sign that read, “No CRT.”
CRT, or critical race theory, dates back to the 1970s, a platform acknowledging that racism is systemic, institutional and pervades virtually every aspect of American society. After the publication of the New York Times’ 1619 Project led by journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones in 2019, Republicans conflated the two and began attacking the project as “propaganda” and passing legislation prohibiting the teaching of the project in K-12 schools. And in March, Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson launched a new initiative called “FACTS” in which those concerned about critical race theory being taught in schools could submit grievances via an online form.
Despite loud conservative calls against CRT, it is widely accepted that the teaching of critical race theory doesn’t take place in K-12 schools. According to Education Week, an online news resource about K-12 education, because critical race theory is more of a framework and lens rather than specific teachings, “much scholarship on CRT is written in academic language or published in journals not easily accessible to K-12 teachers.”
Even so, lawmakers in states around the country, including North Carolina, have introduced bills that would restrict teaching critical race theory or limit how teachers can discuss racism and sexism in the classroom. Based on Education Week’s analysis, 25 states have introduced such bills with eight states having enacted bans.
In NC, HB324, introduced in mid-March, passed the House 66-48 — with all Republican support and none from Democrats — in May and is now in Senate committee. The bill, also called “Ensuring Dignity and Nondiscrimination in Schools,” would prevent teachers from promoting certain concepts related to race or sex. One of the concepts prohibited by the bill reads as follows: “That the belief that the United States is a meritocracy is an inherently racist or sexist belief, or that the United States was created by members of a particular race or sex for the purpose of oppressing members of another race or sex.”
Education Week writes that bills such as this one are “so vaguely written that it’s unclear what they will affirmatively cover” and that they “could have a chilling effect on teachers who might self-censor their own lessons out of concern for parent or administrator complaints.”
Tillman, a Republican member of the school board, stated clearly that critical race theory is not taught in Guilford County Schools.
“CRT is not in our district,” he said. “It’s not a part of the curriculum…. I think there’s been a lot of discussion about it, but the facts are it’s not part of our curriculum.”
Still, during the June 17 protests outside of the Guilford County school board, many parents expressed their concerns about CRT being taught in schools. One white protester who didn’t wish to be named claimed that antifa, a left-wing, anti-racist political movement which is often used as a scapegoat by conservative media outlets, was behind the push for critical race theory in schools.
“I think it’s teaching hate, it’s critical race theory and it’s teaching children to hate each other because of the color of their skin,” she said during the protest. “That’s why we have such poor situations in our streets with antifa…. It’s just what it is. We have people out in the streets fighting because they hate each other for nothing because the mainstream media has preached that to them along with higher education.”