North Carolina House Speaker Tim
Moore showed how political farce takes on a reality of its own during his March
20 appearance on “The Ingraham Angle,” part of Fox News’ fact-free zone, also
known as state television news.

“Another sheriff is saying his
officers will no longer hold ICE detainees, leaving more dangerous criminals on
the streets,” host Laura Ingraham erupted in scorn, seated next to former
acting ICE director Tom Homan.

Buncombe County Sheriff Quentin
Miller represents the perfect bugaboo for Fox News’ paranoid audience as a
Democrat, an African American and a law enforcement official in the liberal
so-called “sanctuary city” of Asheville.

Ingraham rolled some tape of Sheriff
Miller explaining, “We do not make or enforce immigration laws. That is not
part of our law enforcement duties. I will be attacked for this policy
directive, maybe even by ICE. A detainer request is not a valid warrant.”

Then Ingraham invited Moore, whom
she introduced as one of a number of “folks fighting back,” to respond.

“Well, respectfully, I say that
sheriff is wrong,” Moore said. “And that’s why we’ve filed the legislation that
we have — to mandate that sheriffs must honor these ICE detainees [sic].”

In case anyone gets the wrong idea
from Speaker Moore’s statement, Sheriff Miller is right in saying that “a detainer request is not a valid warrant.”

But Moore’s spokesman, Joseph Kyzer,
suggested in response to a fact-check by PolitiFact that his boss had been
misunderstood.

“The speaker responded with his
opinion of the sheriff’s stance on not cooperating with ICE, that he believes
the sheriff is wrong to refuse such cooperation,” Kyzer said. “The speaker
knows all too well that compliance with ICE is not currently required of
sanctuary sheriffs under North Carolina law — that’s why he went on national
television supporting legislation to do just that.”

To further color in the landscape of
non-facts, Ingraham posts a graphic to illustrate Moore’s claim that “it’s
irresponsible for any official, particularly a law enforcement official, to in
any way advocate releasing someone who is a criminal, who has committed a crime
back out of the streets, who should not even be here.” Under the header
“Illegal aliens released under sanctuary sheriffs in North Carolina,” it lists
a “22-year-old arrested for assault on female, two assaults on gov. officials;
19-year-old arrested for manslaughter; 22-year-old arrested for drug smuggling;
and 20-year-old arrested for kidnapping & first-degree rape.”

Of course, the spurious infographic
suggests that undocumented immigrants are more likely to commit crimes than
their counterparts, and of course that’s exactly the opposite of reality. Whatever
the timeframe for the Fox News review, one could quickly assemble a list of
citizens arrested for assault on female, assault on government official,
manslaughter, drug smuggling, kidnapping and first-degree rape who were then
released on bond, after their charges were dismissed or after they were found
not guilty.

House Bill 370, entitled “Require
Sheriff Cooperation with ICE,” is a political circus act designed to enthrall
Republican base voters who love to hate urban liberals. It’s no accident that
Republican lawmakers are pushing this legislation after black Democrats were
elected to sheriff’s offices in the state’s seven largest counties. The new
sheriffs are naturally highlighting their friendliness to immigrants as a means
of connecting with their own political base, but in many cases their policies
aren’t a departure from their white Republican predecessors. That’s because
many legal analysts have concluded that honoring ICE detainers is unlawful, and
the black Democratic sheriffs, like their white Republican predecessors, took
an oath to uphold the law and the Constitution.

“I’m in a battle with the ICE
folks,” BJ Barnes, then the white Republican sheriff of Guilford County, told TCB way back in the distant political
past — April 2018. “They’re asking me to do something illegal. They want me to
hold these folks in jail on a detainer beyond the adjudication of their
charges. That’s unconstitutional and it’s a violation of their Fourth Amendment
rights.”

I don’t recall any Republican
lawmakers labeling Barnes, who campaigned for Donald Trump, as a “sanctuary
sheriff.” Somehow, I don’t think they would have gotten as much political
mileage out of it.

When I have a question about a sheriff’s
office policy, I typically go to the sheriff’s attorney. Unlike the sheriffs,
who have to worry about whether they’re keeping voters and line officers happy,
the attorney’s job is to worry about whether the agency is acting within the
bounds of the law.

“The sheriff’s office does not…
honor requests (i.e. detainers) from ICE to actually hold an inmate for up to
48 hours after the inmate’s state criminal charges have been resolved,”
Guilford County Sheriff’s Attorney Jim Secor said in a Feb. 11 email to TCB. “The reason is that the act of
holding such inmates after their state criminal charges have been resolved is
very likely a ‘seizure’ for the purposes of the Fourth Amendment and the United
States Constitution.”

This is the lawyer for the Guilford
County sheriff. His opinion is the same now that he works for a black Democrat
sheriff as it was when he worked for a white Republican.

Republicans love law and order —
except, apparently, when it doesn’t suit them.

Join the First Amendment Society, a membership that goes directly to funding TCB‘s newsroom.

We believe that reporting can save the world.

The TCB First Amendment Society recognizes the vital role of a free, unfettered press with a bundling of local experiences designed to build community, and unique engagements with our newsroom that will help you understand, and shape, local journalism’s critical role in uplifting the people in our cities.

All revenue goes directly into the newsroom as reporters’ salaries and freelance commissions.

🗲 Join The Society 🗲