_D5C5045brian by Brian Clarey

One might think that for me to endorse the Piedmont Authority for Regional Transportation’s bus between Greensboro and Winston-Salem I would have actually, at some point, boarded one of these buses and taken the ride.

One would be wrong.

No, I have never ridden the PART bus, but it matters not, for reasons I will explain.

The reason I have never taken the PART bus is that, frankly, I don’t got time for that. My job doesn’t allow for fixed departure times, and I often need to go well beyond the downtown depots in my travels.

That’s not to say I wouldn’t take a PART bus. I totally would. And I would even consider taking one to the airport, an unbelievable bargain at $2.40 each way — if I couldn’t get a ride, that is.

But I’m not the kind of customer PART needs. It needs people who live in one city and work in a downtown district in the other, who can ride the bus two, three, maybe even four times a week, maybe 1,000 of them. That would perhaps cover the expense of expanding the lines past 6:30 p.m., so people could stay after work for dinner and catch the late bus home, or take an evening bus across for the theater or a show.

If enough people around here become comfortable taking public transportation — and people who have lived in big cities likely already are — it could become a viable, inexpensive and sustainable piece of infrastructure, stimulating the economy, increasing commerce and elevating property values.

But none of this is happening, because too many of us don’t want to ride the bus.

It’s true: The bus is not a sexy way to travel. It’s the shame train. But the PART bus is quite a bit more comfortable and spacious than the GTA, HiTran or WSTA. And the bus is the gateway drug to a glorious future of public transportation in North Carolina, where we can take the train to the beach or into the mountains, hop a light-rail transport into downtown or ride a hassle-free commute to and from work each day.

All we have to do is get on the bus.


  1. Public transportation is an important need in areas where the density demads it.
    The area that PART covers does not meet this criteria, and a very expensive piece of unecessary window dressing it is to the taxpayers.
    At last analysis we heard that this thing was losing about $25 for every fare purchased.
    Revenue figures bragged about in the few figures allowed our viewing mostly include tax monies from various sources, and we all know that there is only one real source for tax money: us.
    This thing needs, at worst a huge down sizing and shrinking of area coveres and at best a fare increase to justify the huge waste of tax money spent for the mostly empty containers it moves between our cities.
    This is a tie in to an underused airport that has little need for it, and the whole idea is an expensive experiment gone bad.
    There are far better and pressing needs for a shrinking tax dollar in our state’s center, and that dollar is increasingly harder to attain with more stresses on the horizon.
    PART in it’s current form simply needs to go away.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.